 |
25 May 2012, 8:38 AM BST
You are
-
-
,
,
,
,
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
,
,
-
,
,
,
,
,
-
,
,
,
,
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
TSR : Web boards : Internal Enslavement : "Philosophical change in new site?"
Philosophical change in new site? (3)
This post is on the Internal Enslavement web board.
Wed 10 Aug 05, 1:36 AM 710-326-466 US, 6 yrs |
As I recall, the previous I.E. site (which still linked to the slave registry) was primarily concerned with the Male Dominant/female submissive relationship. I also recall an explanation of the rational behind this decision. This agreed with my overall feeling that dominance and submission have a some tangible relationship to gender. That is, that most males feel more comfortable when they have some control in their relationship to a woman and most women seem happier when they have a man able to exert that control (to some extent or another). I'm not denying that there are males who are submissive and females who feel dominant in relationships. But, overall, I feel there is a biological foundation for male dominant/female submissive types of relationships.
In the new site I notice there is far more empahsis on male submissives and female mistresses than in the past. I feel a little cheated as there are so many femdom resources on the net. I didn't really expect to slog through all of that, here. I understand that traffic is essential to a lively site and that may be what caused this shift in focus. But, I wonder, will there be a section devoted to the Male Dominant relationship to female submissives?
Thank you,
Laurie Stevens
710-326-466 |
10 Aug 05, 9:37 AM Tanos UK, 14 yrs Y!
 |
710-326-466 wrote:
As I recall, the previous I.E. site (which still linked to the slave registry) was primarily concerned with the Male Dominant/female submissive relationship. I also recall an explanation of the rational behind this decision.
|
The IE site is still about maledom/femsub relationships of
Enslavement, primarily because that's what lili and I know
about and it's our writings that go there.
However, The Slave Register has always been pansexual,
so the Enslavement web board on TSR is too.
|
This agreed with my overall feeling that dominance and submission have a some tangible relationship to gender.
|
I certainly agree with that, and there are several
"smoking guns" which suggest that some aspects of IE and maledom/femsub
D/s in general have an evolutionary basis. This doesn't
preclude femdom/malesub relationships at all, but does
mean they could be happening for different reasons: in the
same way that homosexuality, SM and masturbation aren't
there for "making babies", even if they probably have their
own evolutionary purposes or causes.
|
In the new site I notice there is far more empahsis on male submissives and female mistresses than in the past. I feel a little cheated as there are so many femdom resources on the net. I didn't really expect to slog through all of that, here. I understand that traffic is essential to a lively site and that may be what caused this shift in focus. But, I wonder, will there be a section devoted to the Male Dominant relationship to female submissives?
|
I will create new boards in the future if the amount of discussion about a specific topic warrants it, but if you
look at the discussions (rather than the posts with little
or no response) most of them involve men or women in
maledom/femsub relationships...
Regards, Tanos www.tanos.org.uk
Edited 10 Aug 05, 9:40 AM by Tanos
|
16 Sep 05, 11:29 PM the_boi UK, 7 yrs £ Y! |
Tanos wrote:
710-326-466 wrote:
As I recall, the previous I.E. site (which still linked to the slave registry) was primarily concerned with the Male Dominant/female submissive relationship. I also recall an explanation of the rational behind this decision.
|
The IE site is still about maledom/femsub relationships of
Enslavement, primarily because that's what lili and I know
about and it's our writings that go there.
However, The Slave Register has always been pansexual,
so the Enslavement web board on TSR is too.
|
This agreed with my overall feeling that dominance and submission have a some tangible relationship to gender.
|
I certainly agree with that, and there are several
"smoking guns" which suggest that some aspects of IE and maledom/femsub
D/s in general have an evolutionary basis. This doesn't
preclude femdom/malesub relationships at all, but does
mean they could be happening for different reasons: in the
same way that homosexuality, SM and masturbation aren't
there for "making babies", even if they probably have their
own evolutionary purposes or causes.
|
In the new site I notice there is far more empahsis on male submissives and female mistresses than in the past. I feel a little cheated as there are so many femdom resources on the net. I didn't really expect to slog through all of that, here. I understand that traffic is essential to a lively site and that may be what caused this shift in focus. But, I wonder, will there be a section devoted to the Male Dominant relationship to female submissives?
|
I will create new boards in the future if the amount of discussion about a specific topic warrants it, but if you
look at the discussions (rather than the posts with little
or no response) most of them involve men or women in
maledom/femsub relationships...
Regards, Tanos
|
Interestingly enough being a gay slave and serving two gay Masters, i have found that since the change in site there are more gay Masters on here. Always nice to see it. I registered on here once i got my first 24/7 Master as i considered it important to make public my status in life. A varied form of D/s participants can only be good. Would be nice though if more gay Masters/slaves participated in these boards though
Still a great site Tanos
boi
x |
17 Sep 05, 1:50 AM kitten_in_chains US, 6 yrs £ Y! |
710-326-466 wrote:
As I recall, the previous I.E. site (which still linked to the slave registry) was primarily concerned with the Male Dominant/female submissive relationship. I also recall an explanation of the rational behind this decision. This agreed with my overall feeling that dominance and submission have a some tangible relationship to gender. That is, that most males feel more comfortable when they have some control in their relationship to a woman and most women seem happier when they have a man able to exert that control (to some extent or another). I'm not denying that there are males who are submissive and females who feel dominant in relationships. But, overall, I feel there is a biological foundation for male dominant/female submissive types of relationships.
In the new site I notice there is far more empahsis on male submissives and female mistresses than in the past. I feel a little cheated as there are so many femdom resources on the net. I didn't really expect to slog through all of that, here. I understand that traffic is essential to a lively site and that may be what caused this shift in focus. But, I wonder, will there be a section devoted to the Male Dominant relationship to female submissives?
Thank you,
Laurie Stevens
710-326-466
|
call this girl crazy, but since she came here, she's been seeing a lot of Master/male sub stuff, which is totally even more opposite. for now, this girl is just saying, "to each their own", and not worrying about who wants what, and who seeks who. the one thing this girl is getting sick of seeing, is stupid trollies that are looking to exploit young women into doing nude stuff. that person should be removed on here, cause he posts everyday with that junk. "white silk kajira"
katya
235-254-022
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|