This page sponsored by Madame S, San Francisco    [other banners]

	TSR : Web boards : Website help : "Edited to delete a really stupid question." 1 2 3 4 5 Edited to delete a really stupid question. (45) This post is on the Website help web board. 15 Jan 12, 3:40 AM tigerlili 3 yrs Lord_Uther wrote: tigerlili wrote: If he did actually step in at all, which I can't be sure of at this point. I like a good, robust debate, I'm happy to be challenged, and was pointing out that I can hold my own, and don't need my Master to throw stones at other posters to help me 'win' a debate. By that reasoning we can't be sure that you have a Master at all, but I personally like to take things at face value on forums unless I have evidence to the contrary, otherwise all this becomes pretty meaningless. And it's your assumption that saphira 'needed' her Master to throw stones. Once again it is a Masters right to do this regardless of their slaves personal feelings, for all you know saphira may well have been begging him not to and he chose to anyway. And one could argue that the opposite holds true in respect of you, that your Master doesn't care enough to step in. I am not saying this I merely present it as a hypothetical statement to help make my point. Oh absolutely, I acknowledge that, but since Prolixity has his own account, I'm confused as to why he didn't just post it under his own name. My Master however doesn't have an account, and he doesn't feel the need to create one to step in to defend me when I'm perfectly capable of doing that myself. I would have welcomed Prolixity's contribution to the 'debate' but instead he, through his slave, attacked me. You seem to be conveniently forgetting that part of his intervention. It's hardly progressed the debate any, now has it? 15 Jan 12, 3:42 AM Prolixitys_Saphira US, 16 mths tigerlili wrote: Ahh, Master comes to the rescue. your "pet" gleefully bangs on and on about how she loves a good debate, and how impartial she is, obviously it's different when the challenges are presented to her. Perhaps she can't handle it all by herself after all. Also, you can read my comments to Hawklord, as they apply to you too. Way to make an 'intellectual" *cough* debate personal. From Prolixity: "1) Hello, you turned it personal with your insults towards my property. For example, you called her "confused," and took offense at her mentioning she is rather impartial even though the comment was not even directed at your comments. Your little stunt accusing her of "generalizations" was rather telling, too. You were more interested in forcing the debate to follow your agenda than actually acknowledging that someone else *gasp* might have a theory that could be right. I guess your experience with a handful autistic people carries more weight than actually living with Asperger's all your life since you required she provide sources for her theories when you yourself relied solely on experience. Color me impressed by your debating techinques! Want to know something? She is a trained mediator who oversees negotiations in divorce cases. The "hot" mediators--that is the ones who do an excellent job and remain IMPARTIAL--get the lion's share of the work. I am proud to say that Saphira had to turn meditations down because she cannot fit them into her schedule. I have no doubt the trend continues when she has settled in here and gets back to working. Oh, one more thing on this point . . . does this intelligence and impressive "life experience" of yours also give you license to cry foul when people insult you? Because you sure do insult people a lot yourself. Thin-skinned little hypocrite. 2) I am her owner and it is my RIGHT to butt into any and all arguments as I see fit. Thank you to Lord Uther to already saying that. I think she was doing a wonderful job debating and debating does improve her courtroom skills which is what I wish to occur. I was just tired of your attitude. It appears I was not alone. 3) You said your original quote (see below) applied to me as well as Hawklord, so I should address that, too. "Ugh, you realise you come off like a buffoon, right? If you were trying to be funny, you completely missed the mark. Last time I looked we were all equal on this website, regardless of our statuses in our relationships. Your condescending and sexist approach reinfoces my views about self proclaimed "masters", Master is as Master does." -- tigerlili Ugh, you do realize you come off as a complete bitch? If you were trying to make an intellectual contribution to the board you would not have such a giant chip on your shoulder. You would accept that others have opinions and ideas as well. In fact you exclude yourself from your statement that all are equal here through your actions. I think you meant to say "Last time I looked we were all equal here, except me because I am God's gift to intellectual debate." Tell me, would you throw in a "Bow to me!" if your master--I use that term loosely--would let you? You really have no idea how to socially interact with others. It is ironic that my autistic pet can deal more effectively with others than you can. But if your "master" enjoys having a social moron for a "sub" then that's his business. Awww, she called me sexist. Isn't that cute? Can you point out exactly where I was being "sexist?" Because I sure as hell do not see it. I guess it is sexist to call a female sub to task for her horrible attitude towards others. The horror! I'm such a misogynist! Oh, and using fifty-cent words like "buffoon" does not mean you are bright. It means you are being pretentious. Now get that sand out of your vagina. It is annoying the rest of us. Good luck, tigerlili. You are going to need it with all the enemies you are making. I now return this account to Saphira. And don't you worry about my pet raining on your parade anymore. I have decided that she has better things to do than debate with someone who regards others as less worthy of basic consideration than the gum I scraped off my shoe the other day. I believe that is all this account will say on this thread. Good day, all. Owned, loved and protected by Prolixity. 15 Jan 12, 6:10 AM 333-528-841 CA, 3 yrs tigerlili wrote: My response comment to Hawklord about being attacked was in relation to you saying this: 333-528-841 wrote: This was obviously edited to include the original thread, since it was not on here last night. You make a statement about how disappointed you were with this thread, but when the OP deleted it, giving an explanation I might add, as well as an apology, you edited your post to include the original OP for those of us who were not aware of the total content. Not in regard to anything else that you wrote. If saying someone did something, in a definitive way such as you did here, and they didn't, I define that as an attack. You did falsely accuse me, right? Or is that just my "perception"? Sorry once again Rhua, I did say I wouldn't post again on this thread so you can cage me and put me in a straight jacket as punishment Ok, so I made an erroneous statement, sorry "falsely accused" you but do not see where I have personally "attacked" you... no baffoon calling or personal comments involving your life, how you live it, your Master , if you are twue or not, etc, etc, etc ..I guess once again our perceptions differ on what an attack is. I also apologized, and you did say you would TRY to accept it gracefully. I, am not perfect. I have never said I am. I make mistakes, and I will admit to mistakes as I did in relation to this thread, but I will not give a pound of flesh to go with it. We have different thought processes, one is no better than the other, it is what it is and that is that. Have a good evening or not. Disclaimer: My thoughts and writing style may differ from yours. I take no responsibility for your perception. Read at your own risk. 333-528-841 Life shouldn't be measured by the breaths you take; but by the moments that take your breath away - unknown 15 Jan 12, 10:01 AM Hawklord UK, 6 yrs 333-528-841 wrote: Since that was over 20 posts ago on this thread, I would hope that Hawklord was referring to more than a time stamp from my misinformed earlier post The time stamp thing was just something that stood out to me as being petty and acrimonious - see below. Just an example. tigerlili wrote: you are accusing me of. To avoid this type of mistake (or rather, false accusation) in the future, I recommend you are more diligent in your checking of timestamps where posts have been edited, as in this case it's perfectly evident what went down and when. Such vitreol, tigerlili! And it never stops. I repeat that you should drop this and get out. You are digging a bigger and bigger hole for yourself. I am not telling you what to do, just advising. It should be your master's responsibility. I sense that He knows nothing of this. You are shaming Him. If you were mine I would pull you out of here fast and start working on your attitude. Luckily my problems are smaller. Sic volo. sic jubeo. stat pro ratione voluntas Edited 15 Jan 12, 10:07 AM by Hawklord 15 Jan 12, 11:47 AM slave_emma US(OK), 6 yrs Y! I think this whole thing is ridiculous. Let me explain why. Rhua asked for this to be deleted, yet it seemed to have continued on with what turned into whether or not someone can be completely unbiased. This is all irrelevant because Rhua asked for the tread to be deleted, which would imply not continuing on with the discussion. There was also the whole thing with time stamps, personally, if someone accused me of doing something I did not do. I would call them out on it. Similar things have happened to me before, 333 had the integrity to apologize which is something when I was falsely accused on a discussion board. My attacker didn't have the integrity to do. Someone admitting they were wrong on a discussion board is rare. We have had users with strong opinions in the past; I remember times on this board where if you did someone differently someone would decide your point of view is wrong and want to argue for the sake of being the twuest. One thing I realized early on this discussion board is my life experience is different from the other posters and sometimes it is worth adding my two cents even if no one agrees with me. Whether or not I discuss it with them at length depends on a number of factors. The two primary factors are whether or not there is anything more to discuss other than a difference of opinion and if the poster is civil. Also, it had been questioned whether or not Hawklord's sense of humor is well liked. Hawklord strikes me as having a dry sense of humor, much like myself. I admit I had to Google to find out what nadu was. Before I Googled it, I pictured me sitting on my bed saying nadu over and over again, sort of like a bad sci-fi movie. Anyways, I would like us all to be able to get back to our regular programming. I hope we can all agree to stop with this bickering and go back to what we're here for. To discuss, not flame each other. Best wishes, slave emma Master Howard's little girl