 |
25 May 2012, 5:24 AM BST
You are
-
-
,
,
,
,
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
,
,
-
,
,
,
,
,
-
,
,
,
,
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
TSR : Web boards : M/s D/s O&P : "the way you vote?" 1 2 3
the way you vote? (30)
This post is on the M/s D/s O&P web board.
9 Feb 10, 5:54 AM 898-443-818 US, 5 yrs  |
i am surprised at the amount of independent voters! Good question!
898-443-818 |
9 Feb 10, 4:46 PM mutable 2 yrs |
I feel it is important that people do actually use the vote they are *given*. For women and the 'common' man, votes were hard won - and I like to think I don't disrespect their efforts by ingnoring such a fundemental democratic act.
However, since we are not talking about deomocracy here, my ability to vote would be in the *other's* hands if they want it, to use as they see fit. This may be generally or as a more specific means of control. Caveat : Non offensive and always learning.
|
9 Feb 10, 5:18 PM SirSeven 3 yrs |
When it comes to my girl's voting choices, ultimately, it's in my hands.
So far I have not needed to make the choice for her as we share similar political views. |
9 Feb 10, 5:21 PM SirSeven 3 yrs |
francesca wrote:
i'm republican. if i was instructed to vote liberal then i'd respectfully request to decline voting.
Theres no way i'd vote the John Kerrys and Obamas(no he's not "liberal" but is against most of my beliefs)of the world into office.
I'd rather be whipped.
|
I'd rather be whipped than vote republican, but that's another topic! (sorry all for the derail, couldn't resist this one.) |
14 Feb 10, 11:38 AM cadenas US, 6 yrs |
jakesemma wrote:
the way you vote?
if your Master told you to vote a certain way because they felt it benefited the household the most to vote that way...
would you, or would you not do it if it went against how you'd have voted on your own?
do you believe your obedience is applicable to things like this as well?
|
I believe that a Master has the right to do with a slave as he wishes - but he cannot do with the rest of the country as he wishes. A master telling a slave how to vote would blatantly violate the election principle of "one man, one vote". It's ballot stuffing, plain and simple.
For that reason, I consider it highly unethical if not fraudulent and on a par with bribery, gerrymandering and other shenanigans.
|
14 Feb 10, 8:02 PM 529-314-296 US, 4 yrs 
 |
ravenkaldera wrote:
My slave votes how I tell him to. His vote is a resource of mine to use, just like everything else of his.
-Raven Kaldera
-------------------
As a collared slave and the property of a Man, i fully agree with Master Raven. i am a "resource" for my Master in all aspects of life -- no exceptions.
Conformity is not the same thing as compatibility. If i wasn't compatible with my Owner's will in the most important things, there wouldn't be much substance for a lasting relationship.
In the less important things of life, conformity to His will is taken care of under the rubric of obedience.
The purpose of my life is to serve my Master -- to make His life easier and better. i have committed my life to His service for the benefit of both of us.
i am an extension of my Master -- yes, a resource -- not to act apart from Him, and certainly not contrary to Him.
Where not compatible, it's my duty to bring myself into conformity to my Master with humility, learning what He teaches me and His reasons for it, if He chooses to give any.....
Therefore, i would vote as He told me without the slightest hesitation or second thought as the most natural thing for me to do as His slave.
slave bagoas
|
"Slaves, obey your human masters in everything with the reverence, the awe, and the sincerity you owe to Christ." ~ St. Paul (Colossians 3:22)
|
21 Feb 10, 5:45 PM 000-719-381 US(TX), 10 yrs Y!
 |
There was extensive discussion of this previously, before the 2008 elections. See the thread titled "x (23)" .
it believes its Owner owns its right to vote and its choice in voting.
Most respectfully
000-719-381
|
25 Feb 10, 1:19 PM 000-534-458 US, 8 yrs 
 |
529-314-296 wrote:
ravenkaldera wrote:
My slave votes how I tell him to. His vote is a resource of mine to use, just like everything else of his.
-Raven Kaldera
-------------------
As a collared slave and the property of a Man, i fully agree with Master Raven. i am a "resource" for my Master in all aspects of life -- no exceptions.
Conformity is not the same thing as compatibility. If i wasn't compatible with my Owner's will in the most important things, there wouldn't be much substance for a lasting relationship.
In the less important things of life, conformity to His will is taken care of under the rubric of obedience.
The purpose of my life is to serve my Master -- to make His life easier and better. i have committed my life to His service for the benefit of both of us.
i am an extension of my Master -- yes, a resource -- not to act apart from Him, and certainly not contrary to Him.
Where not compatible, it's my duty to bring myself into conformity to my Master with humility, learning what He teaches me and His reasons for it, if He chooses to give any.....
Therefore, i would vote as He told me without the slightest hesitation or second thought as the most natural thing for me to do as His slave.
slave bagoas
|
a slave ia a slave is a slave!
There's no "pick and choose" when you're a slave.
There's no «i'll take this part but not that part»!
you do as you're told.
And that's that!
|
slave 000-534-458
|
1 Mar 10, 12:28 AM MasterRsfaggot US(OK), 2 yrs 
 |
Master and i have discussed this, and we have agreed that i will vote exactly as instructed, effectively giving Master an extra vote. We do both happen to be disgusted with the Republican party. However, although we are both democrats, i would vote for a republican, or heck, even a communist, if i was instructed to. i may discuss with Him beforehand, what our vote will be, but when He makes His decision, it is final, and will be obeyed. |
1 Mar 10, 10:37 PM 650-736-585 GR, 2 yrs 
 |
Greetings,
Due to my strong political vies, I would say that "slaves" shouldn't vote at all.
Firstly, as a mater of principle. Since they consider themselves as owned property to someone else, they cannot build the personality needed in order to express their political views, since they're subjected to their Master's will.
Secondly, cause they may harm "Democracy" by double casting their Master's vote (or even more if Master has many slaves), which by default is wrong in a democratic regime. It may look too much, if you think of the "low" (?) number of slaves; but what would happened if, for example, at the years to come we'd have a 10% population of slaves who ought to vote as their Masters dictate? (thus, doubling Masters' vote power)...
Hmm... Thoughts for food...
(^__^);... • I humbly ask for your tolerance and forgiveness to my ignorance.
|
Next page
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|