This page sponsored by Extreme Restraints    [other banners]

	TSR : Web boards : Other Topics : "Piercing the hood how bad is it and how good is it" 1 2 Piercing the hood how bad is it and how good is it (16) This post is on the Other Topics web board (moved from M/s D/s O&P). Thu 3 Apr 08, 1:20 AM 988-477-532 US(GA), 4 yrs Y! my master is piercing my hood in 3 to 6 months and i am wondering about numerous things. 1. how bad is the pain during and during the healing process. 2. how long dose the healing process usually take. 3. how do i need to care fore it while it heals. 4. dose it make the clit more sensitive to touch. 5. will i ever be able to fly again lol sorry just lighting thing up a bit. i would love to hear for women who have had this done. thank you for your time and have a safe and subservient life. 3 Apr 08, 1:54 AM enahrose US(AL), 4 yrs 988-477-532 wrote: Piercing the hood how bad is it and how good is it 1. how bad is the pain during and during the healing process. 2. how long dose the healing process usually take. 3. how do i need to care fore it while it heals. 4. dose it make the clit more sensitive to touch. 5. will i ever be able to fly again lol sorry just lighting thing up a bit. i would love to hear for women who have had this done. thank you for your time and have a safe and subservient life. I had mine done nearly 3 years ago. I did extensive research prior going and found a very reputable piercer in NO, LA named Angel. So in reply: It is no worse then a shot it is very quick prick and its over. VCH is one of the fastest healing peircerings there is and healing was no problem at all. Your peircer will give you direction in caring for it but basicly just good Hygene. I do not see a change in sensitivity but some girls do that varies person to person I just went through a metal detector and it not go off =) I love mine =) and would do it again! 3 Apr 08, 2:22 AM SeanT70 9 yrs This topic was covered very recently here; http://www.slaveregister.com/boards/ritual/17707... ..to add My own opinion to the thread though, from the Master's angle; I wouldn't let a needle near My Girl's clit again if I was paid a million quid. Our sex-life was very much affected and one of my personal favourite activities - that is going down on My Girl was very much affected, in so much as the area desensitised somewhat - this, of course, doesn't mean it's the case for all girls that have the same piercing, and your own experiences with may vary greatly from My Girl's. As the poster above says though, be sure to get good advice on it before you get the piercing done and listen to your body; here's some information for you, that we've learned from our piercer, who we both trust implicitly; Even if the piercing is done to the utmost hygienic standards, with the best quality products, in a sterile environment, you can't avoid the thing of being female and as such given that you have a monthly cycle, the hormonal changes make your body try to reject any foreign body that it doesn't want, so you need to pay close attention to your piercing when your period is due and more so when you're on it. Pay even closer attention to this if you have a history of metal allergies. Titanium with PVD coating is what our piercer recommends for such things. The other thing for this piercing and others like it, is that a lot of people forget simply to wipe front to back when they've been to the toilet. It sounds stupid, but it's easy to spread more germs and bacteria than was ever necessary just by wiping the wrong way. A lot of people could've avoided a very un-necessary trip to the doctors office if they'd not wiped forward and given themselves an infection! The other thing is this; bodily fluids can be your best friends; fresh urine is sterile, you'll be cleaning the area when you got to the toilet but don't neglect to wipe. Two enzymes in the mouth - ptaylin and lingual anti-microbial peptide are both natural sterilising agents; so long as there are no underlying oral problems such as mouth ulcers or the like, having oral sex performed is actually beneficial to keeping the infection free. Healing time, how much it's going to hurt, and the final result all depends on the individual body belonging to the person being pierced. Even though it's not a piercing I can have done for obvious reasons, there are others that I wouldn't have done again or similar reasons as above, and more, like onset of infection, and that the jewellery just plain got in the way or was difficult to keep clean. It's all very much a question of personal taste, personal choice, and research. No pain, no gain as the 'ol saying goes. Sean Master's l'il oneŽ(her Rights are Mine in reserve) 4 Apr 08, 7:14 AM little_linnet US, 6 yrs Just one quibble and that is that hormones and menstrual cycles have nothing at all to do with the possibility of jewelry rejection. If a woman's body is going to reject a piercing (for whatever reason -- her body simply doesn't accommodate it well, it's placed badly, she's reacting to poor quality jewelry, cleaning or fooling with it is irritating it, whatever) then it's going to reject, on the rag or not. And a woman's own healthy secretions, including urine, cervical/vaginal mucous and menstrual blood, are harmless to her piercings. You're on the money about feces, though. That's a great way to infect a piercing. That said, some women (including me) experience hormonal reactions from their piercings during their periods. My genital piercings twinge and swell when I'm menstruating, although not as much as they did when they were brand new. This is completely unrelated to rejection, though. (Piercings can also react to illnesses -- I had two healed piercings suddenly flare up in an ugly way when I had strep a couple months ago and many people say their piercings act up when they have cold or flu.) OP, vertical hood piercing is probably the most common female genital piercing there is. It's an extremely simple piercing given that your hood can accommodate it (Google "Q-tip test") and heals very quickly. It goes through far less tissue than an earlobe piercing does. Krista Accept that you are a nutcase and proceed accordingly. Edited 4 Apr 08, 7:17 AM by little_linnet 4 Apr 08, 12:22 PM SeanT70 9 yrs little_linnet wrote: Just one quibble and that is that hormones and menstrual cycles have nothing at all to do with the possibility of jewelry rejection. That said, some women (including me) experience hormonal reactions from their piercings during their periods. My genital piercings twinge and swell when I'm menstruating, although not as much as they did when they were brand new. This is completely unrelated to rejection, though. (Piercings can also react to illnesses -- I had two healed piercings suddenly flare up in an ugly way when I had strep a couple months ago and many people say their piercings act up when they have cold or flu.) Rejection of a piercing can happen over a course of months through migration rather than 'just' simple infection that we may expect very soon after a piercing is done. Migration is where the piercing pushes up and through sound, solid skin, parallel to itself, over the course of time, resulting in the piercing being rejected, and as such, hormones, and significantly notably in women, have a big part to play in this process given that the same hormones are responsible for skin and ligament elasticity during pregnancy, labour and child-birth, because the hormones make the skin stretch and thin, akin to a length of 'weighted' fuse-wire through an ice cube, a lot of people won't notice until the piercing drops out. The menstrual cycle is a complicated process with many chemical changes happening at one time or another, and simply because 'one' girl doesn't have any problems at her time, it doesn't mean no-one else will; also you have to bear in mind that each one of these could be on different types of birth control or maybe other medication that makes the healing process longer and more drawn out. I know a few girls that have a LOT or trouble with piercings during their time of the month, and have lost piercings (at different locations on their bodies incidentally) for having them done at different times, notabaly just before their periods - also notably with surgical steel, which contains nickel, which also maybe worth thinking about when you have it, or any piercing done. Sean Master's l'il oneŽ(her Rights are Mine in reserve) 4 Apr 08, 5:48 PM 741-498-880 4 yrs MasterS70 wrote: little_linnet wrote: Just one quibble and that is that hormones and menstrual cycles have nothing at all to do with the possibility of jewelry rejection. That said, some women (including me) experience hormonal reactions from their piercings during their periods. My genital piercings twinge and swell when I'm menstruating, although not as much as they did when they were brand new. This is completely unrelated to rejection, though. (Piercings can also react to illnesses -- I had two healed piercings suddenly flare up in an ugly way when I had strep a couple months ago and many people say their piercings act up when they have cold or flu.) Rejection of a piercing can happen over a course of months through migration rather than 'just' simple infection that we may expect very soon after a piercing is done. Migration is where the piercing pushes up and through sound, solid skin, parallel to itself, over the course of time, resulting in the piercing being rejected, and as such, hormones, and significantly notably in women, have a big part to play in this process given that the same hormones are responsible for skin and ligament elasticity during pregnancy, labour and child-birth, because the hormones make the skin stretch and thin, akin to a length of 'weighted' fuse-wire through an ice cube, a lot of people won't notice until the piercing drops out. The menstrual cycle is a complicated process with many chemical changes happening at one time or another, and simply because 'one' girl doesn't have any problems at her time, it doesn't mean no-one else will; also you have to bear in mind that each one of these could be on different types of birth control or maybe other medication that makes the healing process longer and more drawn out. I know a few girls that have a LOT or trouble with piercings during their time of the month, and have lost piercings (at different locations on their bodies incidentally) for having them done at different times, notabaly just before their periods - also notably with surgical steel, which contains nickel, which also maybe worth thinking about when you have it, or any piercing done. The human mouth is the dirtiest place on the human body... I hope no one actually follows this advice.... if they get an infection from oral sex.... Please, if you get it peirced do NOT have oral sex or any mouth contact down there until you are fully healed and not at risk for infection. Straight from a dentist website : Saliva carries microorganisms, bacteria and viruses. You've probably heard the mouth is the dirtiest place in the body: a human bite has more bacteria and is more dangerous than a dog bite, according to the Center for Disease Control. The CDC also preaches - and I agree - that hand washing is "the single most effective way to prevent the transmission of disease". However, they don't talk much about kissing. None of us likes to think that something we enjoy so much could be hazardous to our health. Unlike ordinary dirt, the hitch with germs is that they are invisible. Most of them are so small they can only be seen through a microscope. Their diminutive size, however, doesn't reduce their threat. Many different types of bacteria, like Strep Mutans, the bugs responsible for cavities, can be transferred from one mouth to another through kissing. Other organisms, like viruses, parasites, and yeasts, can be passed along as well. 4 Apr 08, 7:31 PM SeanT70 9 yrs jakesemma wrote: The human mouth is the dirtiest place on the human body... I hope no one actually follows this advice.... if they get an infection from oral sex.... Please, if you get it peirced do NOT have oral sex or any mouth contact down there until you are fully healed and not at risk for infection. Straight from a dentist website : Saliva carries microorganisms, bacteria and viruses. You've probably heard the mouth is the dirtiest place in the body: a human bite has more bacteria and is more dangerous than a dog bite, according to the Center for Disease Control. The CDC also preaches - and I agree - that hand washing is "the single most effective way to prevent the transmission of disease". However, they don't talk much about kissing. None of us likes to think that something we enjoy so much could be hazardous to our health. I'm glad your post paid note to our canine friends carrying less bacteria in their saliva than we do emma; I don't think nearly as many people realise that as they should, ya know! On one point though, I'm not going to try to refute your information because in some respects it's very valid for safety's sake, but isn't odd ( only ) given that the human body is a stange mechanism in itself, how the lingual anti-microbial peptide found in human spit makes an oral piercing faster healing than maybe many others under normal circumstances. Trip it up with other organisms and problems start. Bizarre. Like you said though, for re-iteration, it's best to not indulge in such activity in that case, but then, really, consider this; would you eat steak if it was off? Would you eat salty foods if you had a sore mouth? You'd either chuck it and buy new steak or wait for the problem to heal because it'd sting anyway. Or is that just common sense kicking in? Oh actually, I forget, people are bent on self-destruction, ergo sod the sell-by date and ignore the salt. As for the information of the dentist's website; this is all very well but the trouble with the very anti-bacterial society we live in these days is that no-one has any kind of resistance to even the slightest germ and as such human existence is fated to certain doom over time. If people actually got themselves dirty (with whatever) once in a while and were willing to expose themselves a bit more freely, more resistance would be built up to more disease and there wouldn't be such the pandemic to so many 'allergies' of modern times. It's utter rubbish to suggest that these things are new, they were always there - it's just people chose (badly) to handle them differently. Post that on a website. Fact. Sean Master's l'il oneŽ(her Rights are Mine in reserve) 4 Apr 08, 8:12 PM little_linnet US, 6 yrs I just can't agree with you, Sean. It's true that migration and/or rejection usually aren't caused by infection; our bodies' normal response to foreign objects is to try and move them out, and healing a piercing means making the jewelry more effort and risk for our body to push out than to form a fistula around. When we fail at doing this, migration and/or rejection is what happens. I don't know of any evidence at all, though, that menstruating or female hormones have anything to do with the migration/rejection process. First of all, our whole bodies are affected by said hormones, from tip to toe, so if it were true any and all piercings on the female body would be subject to these mysterious rejection hormones. Second, the male body also undergoes hormone cycles (many of them the exact same hormones), and it makes no sense to claim that somehow in the female body these hormones cause piercings to reject but not in the male body. True, hormones do a lot of the work of thinning and stretching a woman's pelvic tissues for birth. If you were claiming that *pregnant* women experience higher rejection rates because of these hormones I'd buy it. But that's the thing about these hormones: they kick in when they're triggered my pregnancy, you see. We don't all walk around all our adult lives loosened up enough to squirt out a small turkey. If you have any evidence that women's menstrual cycles/hormones are a causation of rejection/migration, rather than a correlation, I'd like to see it, otherwise I don't see any reason to believe that the two are connected. I think that if a woman doesn't notice the long and drawn out process of migration rejection until the jewelry drops out, it's because she's not tending to look at her genitals as often and easily as she might look at, say, her earlobes, and I think if rejecting piercings are more likely to actually drop out during the menstrual period that can probably be explained by a woman bumping or tugging a piercing that already hangs by a thread while she changes a pad or tampon or wipes away some blood. As you yourself say, migration is a process that takes time and I think it's unlikely that non-traumatic migration all the way to rejection would happen in the week a period takes. My (female, highly experienced and recommended at genital work) piercer also thought your theory was one of the strangest things she's ever heard, when I mentioned it to her. By the way, there's no such thing as "surgical steel". Some grades of stainless steel do have high nickel content. 316LVM implant grade stainless steel has extremely low levels of nickel, so low that I understand it can be and has been used for surgical implants in nickel-sensitive people, never mind piercing jewelry. Of course if someone suspects they may be sensitive even to 316LVM stainless, titanium jewelry is a smart option, but most people who react to stainless aren't reacting to 316LVM. Krista Accept that you are a nutcase and proceed accordingly. 4 Apr 08, 8:34 PM SeanT70 9 yrs I base my comments on simple facts of rejected piercings, medical diagnoses thereafter from very well qualified obstetrically qualified medical personnel, who might actually know a thing or two about the said hormones. It's also a simple case, rather than a correlation (ergo does not have to be rocket-science)of watching a piercing work its way further out of the body at a faster rate during the height of a cycle (and I'm talking more than one piercing one more than one body, here, FYI), than they did at the lesser hormonal phase. It's worth acknowledging that piercers, in general are qualified in exactly that - piercing, and can offer to think Me strange as much as they wish, and as such they cannot argue with the scientific fact that hormones during the scientific wonder of childbirth thin skin which is indeed the foundation of their workplace. At no time whatsoever in any of My posts in any of the threads regarding piercing, or any of the spin-off topics because other threads go off at a tangent did I make any suggestion that a woman or any women go around 'jacked up' with any level of hormones abling them to squirt out a body the size of a turkey. Moreover, I made reference to the metals used in piercings as 'surgical steel' given that sometimes that is what it is referred to by 'some' people. Remember we come from different places, so you may refer to tissue as 'kleenex', or trousers as 'pants'. Lastly, at no time whatsoever did anyone suggest that you, nor anyone else has to agree with Me about this or anything else. Frankly, I couldn't care less. In light that this topic seems to have risen to the heights of escalation into some stupid flame war, I'm therefore, having no further part of it, except to say that in a free society, I don't have to ask to be heard, and I won't stand to be corrected to things I've learned through My own experiences of life. Consider that no-one would correct you for the same. Sean Master's l'il oneŽ(her Rights are Mine in reserve) 4 Apr 08, 9:44 PM little_linnet US, 6 yrs Well, speaking just for myself, *I* wouldn't get my panties in a wad if someone DID politely debate me over something I said in a public forum. Vive le difference, huh? Krista Accept that you are a nutcase and proceed accordingly. 4 Apr 08, 10:02 PM shyfox 4 yrs little_linnet wrote: Well, speaking just for myself, *I* wouldn't get my panties in a wad if someone DID politely debate me over something I said in a public forum. Vive le difference, huh? Krista Pair of pugnacious pussy piercing pontificators? Pics please? Next page